Linda Ch 1-2
In chapter two I understood the book to say that ability-referenced testing has limitations and is difficult to interpret accurately, growth-referenced are more reliable when used in conjuction with norm-referenced, and criterion-referenced is very "black and white" and concise. Learning about each individual type of assessment is very useful and I think each type has its place of value to be used, depending on what it is the teacher wants answered (assessed).
In the classroom I was in the past few years, the lead teacher used a portfolio system (growth-referenced) to assist her. The grade was first, and it is obvious that a great deal of change can be seen in a first grader from the beginning of the year to the end. She used the portfolios for a variety of things, not only to record progress or struggles but to help with parent/teacher meetings. I feel portfolios are great tools. And as mentioned, when used along with norm-referenced testing they can be invaluable.
I find it challenging to know the differences between norm and criterion but the chapter clarified it some. I have to keep practicing this. As I was growing up I never did like getting material back and not being sure of how I really did on the assignment. I of course compared my results immediately with someone else's to see where I ranked, usually with my twin sister's.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment